Talk:Moral syncretism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
 |
An entry from Moral syncretism appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 6 April 2007. |
 |
[edit] POV
This article has some pretty severe issues, as is. Instead of explaining what moral syncretism is and various approaches that have been taken to it, it says right at the top that it is essential and starts making arguements for it! And some of the material in the article seems largely irrelevant. Brianyoumans 02:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I just saw the world population density graphic, and wondered what does that have to do with moral syncretism ? Does anyone "own" this page?
[edit] Unitarian Universalism is Quasi-Religious
Unitarian Universalism is a quasi-religious movement, because: "Many Unitarian Universalists consider themselves humanists, while others hold Christian, Buddhist, Jewish, pagan, atheist, agnostic, pantheist, or other beliefs. Some attach no particular theological label to their personal combination of beliefs and may even find such labels to be distracting or destructive. This diversity of views is essential to the movement, since the emphasis is placed on a common search for a meaningful existence, rather than unraveling meaning through adherence to a particular doctrine." The inclusion of the people who fit in the bolded categories show the non-religious elements of the movement. An atheist Unitarian Universalists, for example, would surely disagree that his is a religious tradition. --Evb-wiki (talk) 22:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
