User talk:Montrealartscouncil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Thank you.

1 Speedy deletion of Adam Hawk
2 Do not remove speedy deletion notices
3 October 2007
4 Adam Hawk rubbish
5 Adam Hawk

[edit] Speedy deletion of Adam Hawk

A tag has been placed on Adam Hawk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rudget _{Contributions} 15:05, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Do not remove speedy deletion notices

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Adam Hawk. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rudget _{Contributions} 15:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article, as you did with Adam Hawk, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Indon (reply) — 15:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Hawk rubbish

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you.

Mixing his DNA with Krill and all the other rubbish is just plain wrong. I would suggest you try this on Uncyclopedia instead. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 18:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC) Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 18:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Hawk

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Adam Hawk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Fabrictramp 20:47, 23 October 2007 (UTC)