User talk:Monoape

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 External links in Criticism of religion 2 Please be civil 3 Edit warring and 3RR 4 Theodore Beale

[edit] External links in Criticism of religion

Welcome to Wikipedia.

Fixed one link in Criticism of religion, are there any more? BTW, the quotation you originally included seems relevant and valid: it is controversial of course, and some editors would probably argue that its source was not of the status of Marx or Russell, for example. If you do reinstate it, be bold and use the prominent quotation style of the others!

All the best.

--Old Moonraker 14:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please be civil

Thankyou for your contribution on wikipedia.

One of your recent contributions, in which you called Paul Barlow an "idiot" in your edit summary, does not appear to meet the civility standards of wikipedia. If you have not read it, I suggest you read WP:civil.

As you appear not to have been very active in wikipedia to date, you may not yet be familiar with other policies on wikipedia. If you have not yet, then I suggest you read WP:NPOV, WP:AGF, WP:NOR, and WP:Verify. If you have, I hope you will not mind my comments.

I look forward to interacting with you in the future. TJ (talk) 00:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edit warring and 3RR

Just letting you know that edit warring is not allowed on wikipedia. You have broken the WP:3RR, which is a guidelined rule that says no editor can undo the edits of other editors more than 3 times in a 24 hours period in a single article. Remember, this is just a guideline and 3 reverts is not a right. Edit warring, even under the 3RR limit is disruptive. Editors who continuously edit war and revert get temporarily blocked (or even banned for repeat offenders). So please, stop edit warring on Historicity of Jesus. Instead, remember that wikipedia is a community. We all work together here, and one editor simply cannot force a preferred version of an article over the wishes of others. Please go to the talk page and discuss the issues you have with the article. This way you can start dialogging with other users, and perhaps you can come to an agreement or compromise which satisfies all parties. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Thanks for your consideration.-Andrew c ^[talk] 01:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Theodore Beale

Sorry, I've changed my mind from this morning: I don't feel that my views are worth putting on the article talk page and I have replied to your suggestion here instead. All the best. --Old Moonraker (talk) 17:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)