Talk:Montezuma Castle National Monument
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
|
 |
 |
This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Arizona, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Arizona. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as start-importance on the importance scale. |
Did you intend to put these tags as headers on the main page? Pete Tillman 02:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind. Pete Tillman (talk) 03:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Montezuma Well -- separate page?
User:Node ue moved most of the Montezuma Well information to a separate page on 4/2/08. I thought we should discuss this before completing the move. As the Well is administratively part of Montezuma Castle National Monument, it might be best to keep both together. I don't see any real gain for users from splitting the page. Other opinions? Pete Tillman (talk) 19:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- The well is its own geological entity, even if they are part of the same administrative entity. The earth does not care how we label it. It is after all 11 miles away from the castle itself. --Node (talk) 21:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
As both are officially contained within the same National monument, they should be kept together. Anyway, it is not even close to long enough to require a split in the first place. Reywas92Talk 00:43, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
