Talk:Monster World IV
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the The Sega Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sega products. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within The Sega Project | |
|
Sega Project To-do List:
|
||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
 |
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department) | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
[edit] Opinion
Although the graphics, sounds and gameplay are far the best of the whole serie, I think Monster World IV has a too straight intinerary. Almost all the time Arsha stays in one city -- Rapadagna -- and must save one spirit per time. In Wonder Boy in Monster World, for instance, Shion gets almost lost through a wide map, where one may go almost anywhere at anytime. It´s hard to figure out the next step in WBMW, but in MWIV it is very clear.
Also about the gadgets. WBMW offers a wide range of equipments with different statistics and, the most important, different designs, since you may notice how Shion's look changes with each gadget; the same does not happen in MWIV. --201.6.119.5 12:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Monsterworldiv smd jap.jpg
Image:Monsterworldiv smd jap.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
