Talk:Monetary reform
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| Start | rated as start-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
[edit] NESARA
NESARA is a monetary reform legislative proposal at http://www.nesara.org
The late Dr. Harvey Barnard wrote a book called "Draining the Swamp" which talks about the comming monetary rights movement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.5.110.24 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 23 June, 2005
- Unfortunately, NESARA does not have much credibility since it is connected with New Age thinking about ascended masters, and the like. However, something like the American Monetary Institute which is a genuine movement head by Zarlenga is quite a different matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.78.15.212 (talk • contribs) 09:35, 30 August, 2007
[edit] Major overhaul
I am planning to give this article a major overhaul, if that's OK. It is currently very dense and switches wildly between criticisms and solutions. There are a lot of well meaning sentences but they don't go together and the whole thing is a bit of a dog's breakfast. It also goes alarmingly off-topic from the start.
Money Reform is an important entry point to a little-taught area of economics so I think it is important to introduce the main objections - namely fractional reserve and the fact that governments do not supply money - then move on to offered alternatives.
This restructure will not add any more references, that are badly needed, but it may be easier to add them once it is done. - RubyJester (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- It is done! I tried to keep as many of the existing sentences as possible but nearly everything received attention. I hope you agree it is now be easier to add references and hopefully remove the 'not enough citations' template. Since this is more like an introductory page to many sub-topics I summarised some principles with the onus on the relevant specialist page to back that up. Please jump in. - RubyJester (talk) 19:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
