User talk:Mohsens
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)
Here are a few links you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nice with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.
We're so glad you're here! If you need help or just want to say hello, click here and leave a message! [1] -- Phgao 12:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Re: Livemocha.com
You might want to read the General Notability Guide and the Guide to Web content to help improve this article. The general idea is that in order to be notable, it should be established that a subject has appeared OUTSIDE of Wikipedia and outside of ITSELF in some third-party reliable sources, and that those appearences amount to substantial coverage. Finding some external, third-party review of this website would go a LONG way towards establishing notability. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:09, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- OK, the website seems not to be that famous I thought first :) --Mohsens 07:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Redirect of Lovemocha.com
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lovemocha.com, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lovemocha.com is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lovemocha.com, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Martin-Heidegger-philosophy-of-being-a-critical-interpretation-Herman-Philipse.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Martin-Heidegger-philosophy-of-being-a-critical-interpretation-Herman-Philipse.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Please do not restore this image to Martin Heidegger
Please do not re-insert the image Image:Martin-Heidegger-philosophy-of-being-a-critical-interpretation-Herman-Philipse.jpg in the article Martin Heidegger. [2] [3] It is not acceptable for fair use because Heidegger's physical appearance is not important in this article. Also, other images simply depicting Heidegger probably exist, and a free use alternative can probably be found. In this case, it is better to have no image than a fair use image. / edg ☺ ☭ 09:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Martin Heidegger, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. / edg ☺ ☭ 09:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Martin-Heidegger-philosophy-of-being-a-critical-interpretation-Herman-Philipse.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Martin-Heidegger-philosophy-of-being-a-critical-interpretation-Herman-Philipse.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)