Talk:Mohammed VI of Morocco

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of the Arab world WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Someone should discuss the widespread rumours on the King's alleged homosexuality. Not because they are true, they probably are not. But they are important in themselves and may have political implications.--Farouk yalla 14:08, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

  • That someone should be you, I think. --flyhighplato 19:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
    • As long as you cite credible sources, of course.--Carabinieri 19:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pro-King POV

Well, reading this article it seems like the Morocco King is a pretty democratic nice guy, almost like a Prince Charles from Sahara. But well, things doesn't seem tyo be exactly in this way - just take a look at the BBC article that shows that Mohammed VI, though praised by the so-called International community and shaking hands with Bush Junior at the White House, rules and controls his own country like an autocrat, to say at least.

We should remember that dictators are not just the ones that are against the West. --MaGioZal 18:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Absolute Monarchs are not automatically evil. 24.14.120.92 19:41, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

No, but no one's mentioning the whole Western Sahara thing either, which is very much much on this guys plate. I think issues like this can be brought up in a meaningful way without engaging in false balance, just as an article on George W Bush would mention the invasion of Iraq as a significant source of criticism against him.

66.79.234.185 17:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, the last comment was mine. ManicParroT 17:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)