Talk:Mohammadi Begum
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi guys, I need your help. Lets focus our energies to make this a Featured Article. See WP:FA for more info. Thanks and your help will be appreciated. --Babbarshair 10:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Guys try "Mohammadi Begum" in google [1]. It is the first search result. --Babbarshair 12:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Anit-Ahmadiyya movement page is runers up.
“ | "Its not difficult to reach the top, but to stay at the top" | ” |
Please contribute to stay at top. --Babbarshair 13:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Regarding Muhamadi Begum's Beauty
As Muhammadi Begum's beauty and the status of her family as devoted Muslims is disputed, I have included both POV's about this to maintain neutrality. Either these two facts should not be mentioned at all, or both POV's should be presented together, regardless of which section they appear in.
Sufaid 07:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Clean up Tag
Babbarshair: Can you please clarify your reasoning for the Tag? I am not too sure which "whole pages" have been pasted in a manner any differant that what has been done for the Critical View section. Sufaid 07:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Qadiani Prophet vs un believer
The reference cited clealry mentions that Muhammadi Begum's father considered Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be an unbeliever. The wording on the Anti-Ahmmadiyya web site is such that the words false Qadiani Prophet are the opinion of the web site authors and not attributed to Muhammadi Begum's father. Also it is well known that Qadiani is a derogotary term and as such its use on neutral platforms is inappropriate. In any case the text in the reference itself makes it more reasonable to use "unbeliever" as that is truer to the information that it is propogating.
Sufaid 06:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ahmad.png
Image:Ahmad.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 19:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)