Talk:Moeller High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Moeller High School is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cincinnati, which aims to improve all articles related to Cincinnati and the Greater Cincinnati area.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low-importance within Cincinnati articles.
An appropriate photograph needs to be added to this article, or the current photograph needs to be updated.
     Once this has been done, please remove {{Cincinnati}}'s photo=yes parameter from this talk page.
WikiProject Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-Importance within Schools.

Contents

[edit] Copyright violation

The History section of this article is copied directly from Moeller's website. [1] I'm working to rewrite it, so that it doesn't violate our copyright policy.

 – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 19:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

I've rewritten the History section and turned the Academics section into a quote, so that it isn't plagiarism. It'd be nice to know how many students were in the Class of 1964, so that the sentence "In 1964, the Moeller High School's first class graduated" doesn't sound so weak. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 19:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Academic Excellence

As a local, I've never exactly heard of Moeller as being known for their academic excellence. Certainly their art program, but not much else. Undersea

[edit] No mention of Gerry Faust?

I see that this athletic section has no mention of Gerry Faust, who coached there from 1963-1980 and, quoting from the article about him, his remarkable 174-17-2 record was highlighted by seven unbeaten seasons, four national prep titles, and five Ohio state titles in his last six seasons --rogerd 23:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Notable alumni

Please show some restraint when adding names to the "Notable alumni" list, especially with regard to athletes. I realize that many of the athletes that've been added are well-known in the Moeller community, but in the big scheme of things, they might not necessarily be "notable" enough for Wikipedia. I commented out names of college athletes whose sole description on the page was the sport they play and the school they play for; if there's something that makes these athletes notable, feel free to mention that and add them back in. While you're at it, if you know a good amount about these athletes and they seem noteworthy enough, please consider writing an separate article about them. It's not really helpful to the average reader when they see a list of names, sports, and schools, and know nothing more about these people.

(Yes, I went to St. X, but that's not why I pruned the list a bit. After all, I know one of these guys. I'd just like to see this article reach a level of quality that won't require a "references or sources" sign at the top.)

 – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 00:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Moeller.jpg

Image:Moeller.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to move. —Angr If you've written a quality article... 11:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

From WP:RM:

Official school name should be used for Encylclopedia entry. Other page can be redirect. EagleFan (talk) 17:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Listing here to allow discussion. Andrewa (talk) 05:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm... only 4,510 ghits with Archbishop but 15,400 without, so for every ghit with Archbishop there are two and a bit without. So in terms of Wikipedia:common name, the move doesn't look on.

You may be correct to leave the title as is, but using google hits to determine the title? Just because many article writers drop the Archbishop when writing about athletics does not mean we should discard the name here. Besides, by using the quotes in the google search, you are GUARANTEEING a smaller number of hits for the string with the extra word. EagleFan (talk) 15:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
The Google test is just one piece of evidence that should be considered. Yes, of course the smaller number of hits for the longer string is guaranteed and that fact is not significant. But 15,400 - 4,510 = 10,890 > 4,510, that's what is significant. Andrewa (talk) 11:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Probably the most common mistake about article naming is to think that the official name is always preferred. Perhaps it should be, but current policy is not to. Andrewa (talk) 05:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.