Modified discrete cosine transform

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The modified discrete cosine transform (MDCT) is a Fourier-related transform based on the type-IV discrete cosine transform (DCT-IV), with the additional property of being lapped: it is designed to be performed on consecutive blocks of a larger dataset, where subsequent blocks are overlapped so that the last half of one block coincides with the first half of the next block. This overlapping, in addition to the energy-compaction qualities of the DCT, makes the MDCT especially attractive for signal compression applications, since it helps to avoid artifacts stemming from the block boundaries. Thus, an MDCT is employed in MP3, AC-3, Ogg Vorbis, and AAC for audio compression, for example.

The MDCT was proposed by Princen, Johnson, and Bradley in 1987, following earlier (1986) work by Princen and Bradley to develop the MDCT's underlying principle of time-domain aliasing cancellation (TDAC), described below. (There also exists an analogous transform, the MDST, based on the discrete sine transform, as well as other, rarely used, forms of the MDCT based on different types of DCT or DCT/DST combinations.)

In MP3, the MDCT is not applied to the audio signal directly, but rather to the output of a 32-band polyphase quadrature filter (PQF) bank. The output of this MDCT is postprocessed by an alias reduction formula to reduce the typical aliasing of the PQF filter bank. Such a combination of a filter bank with an MDCT is called a hybrid filter bank or a subband MDCT. AAC, on the other hand, normally uses a pure MDCT; only the (rarely used) MPEG-4 AAC-SSR variant (by Sony) uses a four-band PQF bank followed by an MDCT. ATRAC uses stacked quadrature mirror filters (QMF) followed by an MDCT.

1 Definition
- 1.1 Inverse transform
- 1.2 Computation
2 Window functions
3 Relationship to DCT-IV and Origin of TDAC
- 3.1 Origin of TDAC
- 3.2 TDAC for the windowed MDCT
4 References

[edit] Definition

As a lapped transform, the MDCT is a bit unusual compared to other Fourier-related transforms in that it has half as many outputs as inputs (instead of the same number). In particular, it is a linear function F : R^2N -> R^N (where R denotes the set of real numbers). The 2N real numbers x₀, ..., x_2N-1 are transformed into the N real numbers X₀, ..., X_N-1 according to the formula:

$X_k = \sum_{n=0}^{2N-1} x_n \cos \left[\frac{\pi}{N} \left(n+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{N}{2}\right) \left(k+\frac{1}{2}\right) \right]$

(The normalization coefficient in front of this transform, here unity, is an arbitrary convention and differs between treatments. Only the product of the normalizations of the MDCT and the IMDCT, below, is constrained.)

[edit] Inverse transform

The inverse MDCT is known as the IMDCT. Because there are different numbers of inputs and outputs, at first glance it might seem that the MDCT should not be invertible. However, perfect invertibility is achieved by adding the overlapped IMDCTs of subsequent overlapping blocks, causing the errors to cancel and the original data to be retrieved; this technique is known as time-domain aliasing cancellation (TDAC).

The IMDCT transforms N real numbers X₀, ..., X_N-1 into 2N real numbers y₀, ..., y_2N-1 according to the formula:

$y_n = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{k=0}^{N-1} X_k \cos \left[\frac{\pi}{N} \left(n+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{N}{2}\right) \left(k+\frac{1}{2}\right) \right]$

(Like for the DCT-IV, an orthogonal transform, the inverse has the same form as the forward transform.)

In the case of a windowed MDCT with the usual window normalization (see below), the normalization coefficient in front of the IMDCT should be multiplied by 2 (i.e., becoming 2/N).

[edit] Computation

Although the direct application of the MDCT formula would require O(N²) operations, it is possible to compute the same thing with only O(N log N) complexity by recursively factorizing the computation, as in the fast Fourier transform (FFT). One can also compute MDCTs via other transforms, typically a DFT (FFT) or a DCT, combined with O(N) pre- and post-processing steps. Also, as described below, any algorithm for the DCT-IV immediately provides a method to compute the MDCT and IMDCT of even size.

[edit] Window functions

In typical signal-compression applications, the transform properties are further improved by using a window function w_n (n = 0, ..., 2N-1) that is multiplied with x_n and y_n in the MDCT and IMDCT formulas, above, in order to avoid discontinuities at the n = 0 and 2N boundaries by making the function go smoothly to zero at those points. (That is, we window the data before the MDCT and after the IMDCT.) In principle, x and y could have different window functions, and the window function could also change from one block to the next (especially for the case where data blocks of different sizes are combined), but for simplicity we consider the common case of identical window functions for equal-sized blocks.

The transform remains invertible (that is, TDAC works), for a symmetric window w_n = w_2N-1-n, as long as w satisfies the Princen-Bradley condition:

$w_n^2 + w_{n + N}^2 = 1$ .

Various different window functions are common, e.g.

$w_n = \sin \left[\frac{\pi}{2N} \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right) \right]$

for MP3 and MPEG-2 AAC, and

$w_n = \sin \left( \frac{\pi}{2} \sin^2 \left[\frac{\pi}{2N} \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right) \right] \right)$

for Vorbis. AC-3 uses a Kaiser-Bessel derived (KBD) window, and MPEG-4 AAC can also use a KBD window.

Note that windows applied to the MDCT are different from windows used for other types of signal analysis, since they must fulfill the Princen-Bradley condition. One of the reasons for this difference is that MDCT windows are applied twice, for both the MDCT (analysis) and the IMDCT (synthesis).

[edit] Relationship to DCT-IV and Origin of TDAC

As can be seen by inspection of the definitions, for even N the MDCT is essentially equivalent to a DCT-IV, where the input is shifted by N/2 and two N-blocks of data are transformed at once. By examining this equivalence more carefully, important properties like TDAC can be easily derived.

In order to define the precise relationship to the DCT-IV, one must realize that the DCT-IV corresponds to alternating even/odd boundary conditions: even at its left boundary (around n=–1/2), odd at its right boundary (around n=N–1/2), and so on (instead of periodic boundaries as for a DFT). This follows from the identities $\cos\left[\frac{\pi}{N} \left(-n-1+\frac{1}{2}\right) \left(k+\frac{1}{2}\right)\right] = \cos\left[\frac{\pi}{N} \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right) \left(k+\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]$ and $\cos\left[\frac{\pi}{N} \left(2N-n-1+\frac{1}{2}\right) \left(k+\frac{1}{2}\right)\right] = -\cos\left[\frac{\pi}{N} \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right) \left(k+\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]$ . Thus, if its inputs are an array x of length N, we can imagine extending this array to (x, –x_R, –x, x_R, ...) and so on, where x_R denotes x in reverse order.

Consider an MDCT with 2N inputs and N outputs, where we divide the inputs into four blocks (a, b, c, d) each of size N/2. If we shift these by N/2 (from the +N/2 term in the MDCT definition), then (b, c, d) extend past the end of the N DCT-IV inputs, so we must "fold" them back according to the boundary conditions described above.

Thus, the MDCT of 2N inputs (a, b, c, d) is exactly equivalent to a DCT-IV of the N inputs: (–c_R–d, a–b_R), where R denotes reversal as above.

(In this way, any algorithm to compute the DCT-IV can be trivially applied to the MDCT.)

Similarly, the IMDCT formula above is precisely 1/2 of the DCT-IV (which is its own inverse), where the output is shifted by N/2 and extended (via the boundary conditions) to a length 2N. The inverse DCT-IV would simply give back the inputs (–c_R–d, a–b_R) from above. When this is shifted and extended via the boundary conditions, one obtains:

IMDCT(MDCT(a, b, c, d)) = (a–b_R, b–a_R, c+d_R, c_R+d) / 2.

(Half of the IMDCT outputs are thus redundant.)

One can now understand how TDAC works. Suppose that one computes the MDCT of the subsequent, 50% overlapped, 2N block (c, d, e, f). The IMDCT will then yield, analogous to the above: (c–d_R, d–c_R, e+f_R, e_R+f) / 2. When this is added with the previous IMDCT result in the overlapping half, the reversed terms cancel and one obtains simply (c, d), recovering the original data.

[edit] Origin of TDAC

The origin of the term "time-domain aliasing cancellation" is now clear. The use of input data that extend beyond the boundaries of the logical DCT-IV causes the data to be aliased in exactly the same way that frequencies beyond the Nyquist frequency are aliased to lower frequencies, except that this aliasing occurs in the time domain instead of the frequency domain. Hence the combinations c–d_R and so on, which have precisely the right signs for the combinations to cancel when they are added.

For odd N (which are rarely used in practice), N/2 is not an integer so the MDCT is not simply a shift permutation of a DCT-IV. In this case, the additional shift by half a sample means that the MDCT/IMDCT becomes equivalent to the DCT-III/II, and the analysis is analogous to the above.

[edit] TDAC for the windowed MDCT

Above, the TDAC property was proved for the ordinary MDCT, showing that adding IMDCTs of subsequent blocks in their overlapping half recovers the original data. The derivation of this inverse property for the windowed MDCT is only slightly more complicated.

Recall from above that when $(a, b, c, d)$ and $(c, d, e, f)$ are MDCTed, IMDCTed, and added in their overlapping half, we obtain $(c + d R, c R + d) / 2 + (c - d R, d - c R) / 2 = (c, d)$ , the original data.

Now we suppose that we multiply both the MDCT inputs and the IMDCT outputs by a window function of length 2N. As above, we assume a symmetric window function, which is therefore of the form $(w, z, z R, w R)$ where w and z are length-N/2 vectors and R denotes reversal as before. Then the Princen-Bradley condition can be written: $w^2 + z_R^2 = (1,1,\ldots)$ , with the multiplications and additions performed elementwise, or equivalently $w_R^2 + z^2 = (1,1,\ldots)$ (reversing w and z).

Therefore, instead of MDCTing $(a, b, c, d)$ , we now MDCT $(w a, z b, z R c, w R d)$ (with all multiplications performed elementwise). When this is IMDCTed and multiplied again (elementwise) by the window function, the last-N half becomes:

$(z_R, w_R) \cdot (z_R c+w d_R, z c_R + w_R d) = (z_R^2 c+wz_R d_R, w_R z c_R + w_R^2 d)$ .

(Note that we no longer have the multiplication by 1/2, because the IMDCT normalization differs by a factor of 2 in the windowed case.)

Similarly, the windowed MDCT and IMDCT of $(c, d, e, f)$ yields, in its first-N half:

$(w,z) \cdot (w c - z_R d_R, z d - w_R c_R) = (w^2 c - w z_R d_R, z^2 d - w_R z c_R)$ .

When we add these two halves together, we obtain:

$(z_R^2 c+wz_R d_R, w_R z c_R + w_R^2 d) + (w^2 c - w z_R d_R, z^2 d - w_R z c_R)$

$= \left( [z_R^2 + w^2] c + [wz_R - wz_R] d_R, [ w_R^2 + z^2] d + [w_R z - w_R z] c_R \right) = (c, d)$

recovering the original data.

[edit] References

Henrique S. Malvar, Signal Processing with Lapped Transforms (Artech House: Norwood MA, 1992).

John P. Princen and Alan B. Bradley, "Analysis/synthesis filter bank design based on time domain aliasing cancellation," IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Sig. Proc. ASSP-34 (5), 1153-1161 (1986). (Described a precursor to the MDCT using a combination of discrete cosine and sine transforms.)

J. P. Princen and A. W. Johnson and A. B. Bradley, "Subband/transform coding using filter bank designs based on time domain aliasing cancellation," IEEE Proc. Intl. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 12, 2161-2164 (1987). (Initial description of what is now called the MDCT.)

A. W. Johnson and A. B. Bradley, "Adaptive transform coding incorporating time domain aliasing cancellation," Speech Comm. 6, 299-308 (1987).

For algorithms, see e.g.:
- Chi-Min Liu and Wen-Chieh Lee, "A unified fast algorithm for cosine modulated filterbanks in current audio standards", J. Audio Engineering 47 (12), 1061-1075 (1999).
- V. Britanak and K. R. Rao, "A new fast algorithm for the unified forward and inverse MDCT/MDST computation," Signal Processing 82, 433-459 (2002)
- Vladimir Nikolajevic and Gerhard Fettweis, "Computation of forward and inverse MDCT using Clenshaw's recurrence formula," IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc. 51 (5), 1439-1444 (2003)
- Che-Hong Chen, Bin-Da Liu, and Jar-Ferr Yang, "Recursive architectures for realizing modified discrete cosine transform and its inverse," IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Analog Dig. Sig. Proc. 50 (1), 38-45 (2003)
- ...and references thereof.

v • d • e

Data compression methods

Lossless compression methods

Theory	Entropy · Complexity · Redundancy

Entropy encoding	Huffman · Adaptive Huffman · Arithmetic (Shannon-Fano · Range) · Golomb · Exp-Golomb · Universal (Elias · Fibonacci) · Asymmetric binary

Dictionary	RLE · LZ77/78 · LZW · LZWL · LZO · DEFLATE · LZMA · LZX · LZJB

Others	CTW · BWT · PPM · DMC

Audio compression methods

Theory	Convolution · Sampling · Nyquist–Shannon theorem

Audio codec parts	LPC (LAR · LSP) · WLPC · CELP · ACELP · A-law · μ-law · MDCT · Fourier transform · Psychoacoustic model

Others	Dynamic range compression · Speech compression · Sub-band coding

Image compression methods

Terms	Color space · Pixel · Chroma subsampling · Compression artifact

Methods	RLE · Fractal · Wavelet · SPIHT · DCT · KLT

Others	Bit rate · Test images · PSNR quality measure · Quantization

Video compression

Terms	Video Characteristics · Frame · Frame types · Video quality

Video codec parts	Motion compensation · DCT · Quantization

Others	Video codecs · Rate distortion theory (CBR · ABR · VBR)