User talk:Mkdw/Archive 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sending warning messages
Hi, when you're sending a varning message to a vandal, could you use {{subst:vw}}, {{subst:test4}}, etc., instead of just {{vw}}, {{test4}}, etc. It means that the text of that particular template will be added to the talk page of the user instead of the user just seeing a sort of mirror image of it. Two advantages are that if the actual template is vandalized, the message you have sent will not be altered in any way, and also less load is placed on the server. For more information, please see WP:SUBST. Cheers. AnnH ♫ 10:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank You
- Thank you for liking my practical joke, and thanks for the barnstar as well. I actually copied it from Reywas92, so I suggest you give him a barnstar too. I actually thought someone had vandalized my talk page when I first read it; it's very funny. Well, thanks again. | AndonicO Talk 00:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Revert on my user page
Thanks for reverting the vandalism. Keep it up :) SMC 03:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
VandalSniper
Okay, I'm sold. Be sure to warn vandals, use "subst" where appropriate, and keep the principle of civility in mind (obviously, although you don't seem to have any problems with that as it is), and I'm sure you'll be a great asset to RC patrol. Thanks for your interest; now for my boilerplate welcome.
Thanks for applying to use VandalSniper! You have been approved. If have not already done so, you may find instructions to install VS on the project page.
As some of the libraries VandalSniper runs on are currently in transition, there have been a few issues reported with setup. At the moment, Linux is the most compatible platform for VS. If you have questions or problems, you may find help on the project page or its talk page. Please also feel free to contact me for help and I will do my best to assist you.
Thanks for becoming a part of one of Wikipedia's best new software tools! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Are you sure that you're a psychologist?
Are you sure that you're a psychologist? As in you got your Bachelor's degree or you're a credited psychologist and recognized by a professional order?--Janarius 20:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
UserPage
Hey Mets. I think you have a great UserPage. I copied and modified the page to make it my own, I hope you don't mind. I also gave you credit at the bottom of my page. Mkdw 19:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Mkdw! Glad you liked my userpage! Yours looks great now too! —Mets501 (talk) 21:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair use images
I was not aware the deleted image was an out of date logo for the operation. I deleted it on the grounds that it was a lower quality replica of the undeleted image, under WP:CSD#Images.2FMedia criteria #1. If you intend on using the historical logo in the article on ITunes, then feel free to re-upload it and use it on that article. As for removing them from userboxes, the use of fair use images in userboxes is strictly prohibited. Please see Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #9. Fair use images are not to be used outside of the main article namespace. This includes userboxes, other templates, or userpages. If you have any questions about this, please feel free to ask. Also, note that you do not have to do "<nowiki>[[Image:Itunes.png]]</nowiki>. If instead you use "[[:Image:Itunes.png]]" it provides a link to the image without transcluding the image. Thanks, --Durin 20:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:Nobel Prize in Physics
I don't understand your edit comment on Template:Nobel Prize in Physics. Please explain. --Srleffler 07:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I think you missed the point (or perhaps I have missed yours). This template is no longer being used the way it was intended. A couple months ago an anonymous editor went through and removed the template from nearly all the articles it was on. The editor replaced it with a bit of wikicode that links back to the template (but doesn't "call" the template). This was a poor way to implement the apparent goal of reducing the size of the navbox. What I am trying to do is reimplement this the "right" way: replace the template with a small template that just links to the list of names found elsewhere.
Now, I completely don't understand your reply to my message. The new template is just a box with two links in it, nothing else. There is nothing for users to "fill in". I have no idea what you are talking about.--Srleffler 07:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Please take a look at the situation and try to understand it. Look at the code actually included on the laureate's pages, say for example Anthony James Leggett. The template was removed from the pages of the laureates some time ago. I am trying to fix this by putting the text that is actually being used into a template. This new template happens to have the same name as the old one which is no longer being used, for convenience. Your argument seems to have to do with the "navbox" layout, but that layout is no longer needed. It is not being included on the pages of the laureates anymore, and hasn't been for some time.--Srleffler 07:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
vandalism
*groan* I didn't even notice until now. Thanks a lot. That guy needs a boot up the proverbial, and pronto... riana_dzasta 08:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I keep blocking his IPs, but he keeps returning. Academic Challenger 08:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
All admins have the tools to do that, but only a few, not including me, actually know how to block ranges without blocking huge areas. I will be here for a while to watch the penguin article and our user page, which are his tragets, but he has been gone for a few minutes so he may have given up anyway. Academic Challenger 08:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Regarding Traditional Catholic Reflections and Reports
I saw the notes regarding problems (notability) and am open to deleting this page if it is not helpful.
Our is an international catholic / ecumenical news site and theological archive, but I don't want to appear to be violating wikipedia rules.
Paxus
Thank you
Thank you for barnstar, David! MaxSem 08:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
continuing vandalism
I guess I spoke too soon about him giving up. Now I'll just block those IPs on site. Academic Challenger 08:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
The Purple Heart Barnstar | ||
A poor substitute for what our midwestern friend neglected to give you. riana_dzasta 09:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC) |
Heh! Well, it was actually for having your userpage vandalised so much, but I thought I'd make mention of his thoughtlessness too... riana_dzasta 09:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
;) No worries. Have a good one! riana_dzasta 10:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
User pages
Thanks for pointing that out. It is of course his right. I sent him a message instead. I think it's more a case of "new and doesn't know" rather than "doesn't want to". All the best. --BlackJack | talk page 09:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Bill Murray
Sorry. I was drinking tonight. I feel bad. I messed up the bill murray info. Dpn't ask why. Bill rubbed me the wrong way in that flowers flick.
I'm sorry. I'm leaving. Message left by Sambo2.
Barnstar
Thankyou. --ArmadilloFromHell 16:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Contributions
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For your outstanding edits to WikiProject Theatre articles, and your organizational contributions to WikiProject Vancouver Lily Towerstalk 06:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC) |
IRC
Hmmm, I'm not really much of an IRC user (first time I used it was the day before yesterday, actually). But WP:IRC might have what you're looking for... riana_dzasta 10:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- :o And you're using my Wikidefcon! Wow... a template I
madeadapted is actually being used. I'm flattered. riana_dzasta 10:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)- Don't mind at all - I nicked it from Misza13, anyway. I would've gone with his version, but I wanted the colours on my userpage to match :p *vain* riana_dzasta 10:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Au contraire, I'd be most flattered :D riana_dzasta 10:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, sorry about the late reply, my mum decided to pick an argument with me :s It's 10:30PM now - I should probably get going, have lots of exam revision to do tomorrow. Take care! riana_dzasta 11:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Don't mind at all - I nicked it from Misza13, anyway. I would've gone with his version, but I wanted the colours on my userpage to match :p *vain* riana_dzasta 10:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey there!
I like your format! I may just take it, Mya!
-Ted in Boston
- Sure go ahead. Not all of the content was created by me though. Lily Towers is responsible for some of the design, so you may want to ask for her permission to use some of the content. Let me know if you need help. Mkdwtalk 08:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Vancouver
I am trying to find the problem with the external or footnote error between 37-40 but cannot seem to find it. Everything looks intacted to me and another user also mentioned that it looks alright. Am I missing something? Mkdwtalk 05:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- SOmeone partially fixed them for your, but the refs still need work. The format is inconsistent. Cite php is preferred. Notice for example that some have "Retrieved on..." and other web refs don't. Be consistent. Rlevse 10:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Footnote 40 has an error--it won't retrieve, it needs fixed ASAP. I'm working on fixing some other ref formatting for you, starting with PDF refs. Rlevse 00:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- I've fixed several refs for you as samples, including #40. If you fix the rest, I'll change to support. Let me know if you have questions. Rlevse 00:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
About the "New Messages" Joke...
It was hilarious! I'm still laughing at myself for falling for that. I can't believe I actually fell for it! Good work, and I award you with my gratitude. That was the first actual laugh I had all day. Two thumbs up, Mkdw! --MaraNeo127talk 03:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
P.S. - Hello, fellow Top 20 Wikipediholic. We... are.... insane...
I really don't know how I got such a high score on a new account. I answered it truthfully too, which makes it even sadder. I guess I was born a Wikipediholic.... --MaraNeo127talk 12:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Feature Article
All these FAC opposes for Vancouver don't seem to have any reasoning and are mostly ficticious. I really hope they don't pull down Vancouver's FAC decision. Lily Towerstalk 10:13, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Ditto. And you can't just reach over and smack 'em either. I don't know why rain-forest-man (or woman, but probably a man) didn't just make an edit himself instead of bringing it up where he did, since he has made edits in the past. On the upside though, is that if we're getting lots of non-constructive feed back in the FAC process, it's a sign that there's not any blatant problems with the article, only minor ones.Bobanny 16:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Hiya
Not bad, thanks! Been studying for exams all day, thought I'd take an hour off and... do some wikilinking. Sad. :) How's the Vancouver FAC going? riana_dzasta 08:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, give me a while to read it through though - the last time I read it was during the last nom, as far as I remember... riana_dzasta 08:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not popular, I just talk a lot :p Good luck with your show! I just finished my biology exam today, so I'm free until Saturday when I have chemistry... then 5 more days until maths... and then I'm free! Can't wait... :) I noticed all the changes that have been made to the article, I honestly think it'll make it. Good luck once again, I hope your show goes really well! riana_dzasta 05:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Vancouver
Thank you for your contributions to WikiProject Vancouver and Vancouver. Your organization and work to improving these articles all across the board have been exempt. 142.35.144.2 23:57, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Vancouver message
I might. I'll see what I can do. -- Selmo (talk) 17:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Skookum1 archive - yes, pls
Yes, thanks, I have no idea how to do it myself. There are items that I've been meaning to respond to (still) that I'll have to remember are on the archived page(s), if I ever do remember to answer them ;-) (ADHD and all that....). BTW I just got a "you have new messages" thing the link for which was "Special:MyTalk" but the "last changes" directed me to Practical joke; guess I should source who did that, if it can be sourced.....not quite vandalism but definitely a prank-call, so to speak. Advice?Skookum1 21:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Studio 58
Category:Vancouver needs to be diffused; that is, as many articles as possible need to be recategorized in more specific and appropriate subcategories rather than directly in Category:Vancouver itself. This is not a negotiable rule on Wikipedia; categories must always be kept to their absolute minimum possible size. There are alternate ways of achieving the categorization goals you want, but moving things back out to Category:Vancouver which properly belong in more specific subcategories is not one of them. Bearcat 09:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- I just created Category:Education in Vancouver a few minutes ago. I haven't moved any articles into it, though. Bearcat 09:25, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Music of the Lesser Antilles
Hey, just pointing out that your pending FAC comment has been addressed: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Music of the Lesser Antilles. Thanks, Tuf-Kat 03:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Vancouver
Hey man, performing arts eh? That's my thing too.
Anyways, I did some major formatting work on the project page (sidebar and stuff) and the talk page. Check to see if your ok with it. AQu01rius (User • Talk) 04:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
FAC, again
I agree - many of Joke's comments are highly subjective (i.e., a matter of stylistic choice, not incorrect or correct). It's extra-frustrating because he/she's coming along now just when we're thinking there's almost a consensus, rather than a week ago when everyone was a critic. In his/her defense, Joke's begun putting some work into the article (re-wrote the intro, not a whole lot better, but a little cleaner, IMO), which makes it easier to assume good faith and to appreciate his/her comments as constructive. Selmo, Skookum, and DS13 have been editing the article again too, so I guess it's a matter of waiting and seeing where the dust settles (they'd just better not mess up the footnotes!).
I think my real frustration right now is with the process. This thing's been an FAC for a while now, so is it just going to be ignored like it was (more or less) the other two times it was nominated? It's supposed to be decided by a consensus of participating Wikipedians - does this mean unanimous? Do we have to obey every flippant or whimsical suggestion that comes up? Does it depend on the mood of the admin whose job is to make that judgment call? Perhaps we're being punished for someone else's busy schedule. I'm not sure how long I can hold out before going to other FACs and making comments like "With the inclusion of incredibly boring details like the latitude and longitude, the very idea of this becoming featured is patently absurd" (to be read in you're best upper class British accent).Bobanny 17:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- On another note, thanks for the archive boxes - and the suggestion to archive my talk page. I've been meaning to do that for a while, but could've put it off indefinitely without the nudge. Bobanny 23:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Joe sure seems to have some wierd objections. We're bad writers? How? The prose is bad? Why? He fails to assert. -- Selmo (talk) 00:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
Here's a barnstar for welcoming newcomers, helping users archive users' talk pages, as well as designing their userpage. You should also should be commended for reorganizing WikiProject Vancouver. Being one of the "senior" members, at first I was a bit uncomfortable, but now it makes a whole lot more sense. -- Selmo (talk) 06:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
People
I'm confused about the "people" list on the wiki-van page that I thought you could clarify. 1st, the original list as I understood it, was of people who either needed an article, or needed their articles evaluated to see if they were up to par. If that's still the intention of the list, then they should eventually be promoted of the list altogether (right now, Pauline Johnston and Bryan Adams should probably be booted from the list). Also, is the new thing with the A,B and C categories something different than the evaluation on the VanProject tag? Vancouver articles are supposed get rated there and given a priority, and this seems to be the same thing. If it is, I don't think its a problem, because these articles are probably getting more attention than they would otherwise, whereas I don't think many Van articles have been evaluated. Cheerio, Bobanny 07:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Hectare
Hi David, I tried to correct a page and apparently you corrected it back? Not quite sure why..
An hectare is bigger than an acre. If there are 49 people in 1 acre, then are going to be more than 49 people in 1 hectare. If we were using, say, square feet, the number of people per squre feet would be lower than the number of people per acre, but as the unit gets larger the number of people fitting into that unit is going to get larger. The extreme case of the largest unit, say where one unit = the size of the city of vancouver, then the density is going to be:
600,000 people / area the size of the city of vancouver
The number of people in the unit increases as the size of the unit increases... the number of people does not decrease.
The math works like this:
( 49 people / 1 acre ) * ( 1 acre / 0.4049 hectares ) = 121 people / hectare
The acre unit cancels out. Leaving a unit of people/hectare. 121 to be aproximate.
If you can point out where I'm wrong, let me know.
Cheers, jonathan jscarter@gmail.com User talk:142.151.171.133
FYI
User:220.76.86.232 and User:211.196.211.215 are on the same ISP, and the latter is blocked, and TigerLilly is blocked indef, must be all the same person. --207.67.146.196 08:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Mom
Hiya! Thanks again for all the hard work! 220.76.95.128 14:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
You must be from Toronto
When the ref for house prices didn't work and I supplied a new source to back up my edit, it was reverted to the original because apparently the old reference was better than the new. I checked again and the link finally worked, making available information for Vancouver and Toronto. The old edit quoted the source by saying "most expensive housing option in Canada", but added that Vancouver was "just ahead" of Toronto, a wording that wasn't even stated by the source. Which also is a gross understatement, given that what the source Italic textdid Italic text say was that Toronto , the closest city behind Vancouver, "trailed by a whopping $120,000", which you removed for reasons unknown. Double-standard much?
- Comment left by Vestpa (talk · contribs) - See User talk:Vestpa for reverse findings.
Not sure which "relevent text" you said you kept, but words such as "whopping" I thought were perfectly legit, afterall they were quoted from such a credible source. And if nitpicking at grammar can warrant removal of an entire phrase as opposed to an edit, it might be useful to add that it makes little sense for "a two-storey house" to be "just ahead of Toronto" as an expensive housing option. Unless Toronto itself is a housing option, perhaps we should take that out that last section altogether my friend. Who added it anyway?
Vestpa 06:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
FA Metal
Thank you very much for the award. It means alot to me. -- Selmo (talk) 02:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Ditto that, and thanks for the kind remarks. Kudos to you for taking this bull by the horns. In my mind, the rest of vanproject articles will move ahead more easily now that there's a precedent and a standard set.Bobanny 05:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Deleting my work
What happened? I created a selected article page, and it gets deleted because the "author requested it". I dislike that, because I get the feeling the my contributions are worthless.
Anyway, I've made the showcased photo page, and declared directorship. Thanks for your work on the portal. -- Selmo (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry if my tone was a bit harsh. Indeed, I have no problem with others edting the portal (it's a wiki after all, becides, WP:OWN disallows this). My only concern was the admin that deleted my work (ie they don't appear in my contributions. Agian, I apologize for any uncivility. -- Selmo (talk) 19:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Smiley Award
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward
User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward1
Re:User_talk:Reedy_Boy#Theatre_Under_the_Stars_.28Vancouver.29
Hi, Sorry for not replying about this message before, i dont actually remember getting it!
I am not sure why this happened, and you were right to revert this part of the edit, and i have put it on the Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser talk page, as it would seem it is a minor bug with the code.
Thanks for alerting me to it
Reedy Boy 22:59, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:ITunes old icon.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:ITunes old icon.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 11:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
iTunes logo
Um, actually, Mkdw I think that only the most recent logo is necessary; see Microsoft Windows as an example. Linux does not even have an official logo, but one is still posted. Scoutersig 16:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, wow, my first comment does look like I think all the old logos are a bad idea; I do not think that. I agreee with keeping them in the article, just not at the top of the page. (See also my comment on the iTunes talk page, which I hope makes it sound like I know what I'm saying.) Scoutersig 15:58, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
iTunes
Than why wasnt every logo displayed? Just the aesthetic? If you have more than the current logo displayed, than you should have everyone. I'll be taking care of that. --Alegoo92 19:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Thanks :) --Alegoo92 01:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you so much for the The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar. I'm going to move it to my user page.
As an extra Thank You, here's a Chocolate Chip Cookie Smiley: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward5
Pedia-I 18:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)