User talk:Mkallgren

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Royal Suedois.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Royal Suedois.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Polarstar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Polarstar.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Serafimerorden.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Serafimerorden.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Valentinian T / C 16:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Order of Charles XIII

Thanks for your contribution. I have wondered how this order functions under the current king, since I understand that he has always refused to participate in Freemasonry. Is there a deputy grand master of the order? J S Ayer 01:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, this is a bit difficult. The King is always the "Lord and Master" of all royal orders. Freemasonry is not a state order, but has always been supported by the Royal Family. The Grand Master of the Swedish Lodge is since 1997 (death of Prince Bertil), a commoner, but up to that time the position of Grand Master of the Freemasons was either held by the king, or a meber of the Royal House.

King Charles XIII established the Royal Order of Charles XIII in the 1810's, it was supposed to be a order given for actis of humility and charity. As such it was stated that it could only be bestowed upon members of the Order of Freemasons. The king was a freemason himself.

In 1974 the Royal Orders of Sweden were reviewed by the government, and it was decided that no order would be bestowed, starting from the 1st of January 1975. Since the Order of Charles XIII was not a public state order, but truly a Royal order bestowed upon individuals for services in a closed soceity it was never withdrawn or changed.

So, to make it short. The King of Sweden is Lord and Master of all Swedish/Royal Order, or those of the:

Seraphim Sword Polar Star Vasa

But he is also Lord and Master of The Order of Charles XIII, the only order where he is in full controll as to who will be proclaimed Knight Commander.

To recieve the order one must atttain the XI grade of the Freemasons, thus becoming a Very Enlightened Brother, also, there can only be 33 holders of the R&K (Riddare och Kommendör med Röda Korset/Knight Commander of the Red Cross) at any one time. mkallgren

Thank you. J S Ayer 02:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Another contributor has deleted the statement about the "red ribbon", denying that the Swedish orders were ever known informally by the colors of their cordons. Do you have anything to contribute on this point? J S Ayer 02:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, I have never seen it referred to ribbon colour in texts so far, but it is not impossible to think that they might have been known by ribbon colour. However, simply talking about existing facts, there is nothing to support the notion of knights being referred to by the colours of their individual orders. mkallgren 10:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you again. J S Ayer

[edit] Order of the Seraphim in the Image:Sverige pfalz vapen.GIF

This order and the other three royal orders in the picture were created by Frederick I in 1748, when Sweden was no longer ruled by the Pfalz dynasty. This and the glitches around the inescutcheon gives the impression that the image is an edited version of the present greater national coat of arms of Sweden. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.64.151.133 (talk) 00:44, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Artreg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Artreg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Artreg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Artreg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] please load up your image in the commons

Hallo Mkallgren. Could you please load up the following picture Image:Albertrmvquirn.jpg on commons, so i could link it to french and german version of the articel of Albrecht Mertz von Quirnheim ! thank you ! ciao Christophe.Neff 19:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Serafimerorden.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Serafimerorden.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Artreg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Artreg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 00:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)