User:Mjangle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About Me:
This user lives in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
This user lives in or hails from Philadelphia.
This user is a college student.
This user is an academic.
IQ This user's Intelligence Quotient is 137.
This user enjoys heavy reading, such as Shakespeare and other dead guys.
This user is a bibliophile.
This user smokes tobacco in a pipe.
CSL This user enjoys the works of C.S. Lewis.
This user enjoys reading poetry.
Fx This user is interested in Space Sciences.

I’m a 21 year old 3rd year Theology student who loves to read and I wish I knew how to contribute more

[edit] Philosophy Wiki/Project

[Templates]

WikiProject Philosophy task list
  • German Idealism and almost all the articles related to it need to be either rewritten or expanded, because a wikipedia user called Lestrade has, among other things, taken it upon himself to imbue each page with bias in favour of Schopenhauer, who he attempts to present as having the last say in everything. This is a terrible thing to do, because German Idealism is such an important period in philosophy, whose influence is still strongly felt today.
  • Protected Values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein is having its FA status reviewed due to a couple of concerns. Help save Ludwig! See Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ludwig Wittgenstein for requirements for retaining FA status.
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Star of Sophia Vote for or nominate someone you think is deserving!
  • Analytic_philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Inverse (logic) This article makes me wish that there were a fail grade on the quality scale. Someone should rewrite it.
Vote | Larry's Text | stubs | edit this list | discuss these tasks | Category:Philosophy | Portal:Philosophy | RFC | Deletion | Requested articles | Noticeboard | Discussion