User talk:Mithos90

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Mithos90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] History merge

I've requested a history merge so the edit history from your talk page here will be copied here for your records. So don't be alarmed or anything by the template! :) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

  • All done. ♠PMC♠ 20:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Future films

Hey, hope you're doing well. Can I suggest checking out the notability guidelines for films? The guideline stipulates that film articles should not be created until release or notable production. Warcraft has not begun filming, so the article should not exist just yet. That's why Warcraft#Film adaptation exists, so early development information can be placed in that section. When filming begins, we can re-create the film article. This is done because many film projects, even notable ones, are stuck in development hell for years. There's no indication that this project will be fast-tracked. Even Superman took 20 years to finally come back to the big screen, you know? So in the meantime, filming information can be added to that section. Let me know if you have any questions! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Also, in regard to Neon Genesis Evangelion (live-action movie), the project doesn't seem to be filming at all. Per WP:NF, you should request for all verifiable content to be merged to the article of the source material. Who knows, it could be 20 years until they make the film for that one. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

You can see if you can propose deletion for each article. This means a template will be added with an explanation why the article should be deleted, and if nobody removes it in five days, then the article will be deleted by an admin. If it is removed by anyone, though, then you should see about merging any verifiable content from the article to the article of the source material (in this case, the Soul Caliber video game, the Pac-Man video game, the Splinter Cell video game). You had good finds! I have Splinter Cell (film) on my clean-up agenda; just hadn't gotten to it yet. I'll add the other items that you've found. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Do you want a hand in addressing these articles of films in development hell that you found? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mortal Kombat

The article wasn't under a user name, that was a user's sandbox. You moved a page you should not have. The article was not ready for existence on its own, thus EVula was working on in their sandbox.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 23:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

I moved it back already. You may want to contact EVula to find out why they haven't moved the article into the mainspace yet.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 23:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Don't worry about moving the article from someone's sandbox to the mainspace. The original article was deleted, so it was userfied to EVula's sandbox so content could be preserved until the film begins production -- if it ever does. I have User:Erik/Isobar (film) myself -- I created the film article before I was familiar with Wikipedia's guidelines, so when I realized the film wasn't going to happen anytime soon, I saved it on my userspace. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nightmare

Bloody-disgusting is reporting from an "insider", which is considered a scooper and doesn't meet Wiki's reliability criteria. If it's true then we can wait till New Line officially announces something. Even then, we'll want to incorporate that as a subsection title "prequel" or "remake" or "sequel" (depending on what it is), until the movie comes out and we can fill in crew information.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cloverfield Mix.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cloverfield Mix.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cloverfield Mix.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cloverfield Mix.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cloverfield Mix.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cloverfield Mix.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Bloodrayne II.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloodrayne II.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Clover Dead.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Clover Dead.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)