Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Zeitgeist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 20:19, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Zeitgeist

Well over a year and a half un updated, no means of updating it (http://www.wikipedia.org/stats is down) and totally unlinked to (Grand total of two links, both from userpages). 68.39.174.238 15:16, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

• Weak Delete Minor interest for historical purposes, I suppose, but the almost complete lack of links shows that no one really shares this interest. Space-wasting, unless someone comes forward and really wants it. Xoloz 17:18, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Its 15 minutes are up... kind of like the Google zeitgeist. Ashibaka tock 06:50, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, it's got historical purposes, and I don't see why deleting such a thing would be useful. Perhaps we can combine it with something more active? - Mgm|^(talk) 11:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, we don't have a space problem. - ulayiti (talk) 16:12, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Space wasn't the reason for deletion, the fact that the page it seems to have gotten its stats from is gone. Also, this page is totally unused, judging by its lack of updates and links. A page like this, in the WikipediA: namespace, is a perfect place for someone to vandalize because it'll never be noticed and will make it look offical ("According to Google Zeitgeist, Wikipedia sucks!"). 12.75.98.103 19:33, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.