Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Belgium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux Talk 23:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Belgium

This nomination includes all of the following pages:

All of the pages included in this nomination are unmaintained, hopelessly incomplete, and have been replaced by their corresponding categories in Category:Wikipedians by location and Category:Wikipedians by ethnicity and nationality. It was the goal of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project to handle all of these lists, but the project has been completely abandoned since April 2007 (diff), has been mostly inactive since August 2006 (see talk page), and hasn't made any real progress since February 2006 (see diff)

Editors who haven't updated to the category system are most likely either uninvolved in collaboration on the subject or inactive (a random check will confirm that many of the users listed on these pages have been wholly or mostly inactive since sometime in 2006). In addition, it's not at all clear whether the lists reflect nationality or current place of residence.

See precedents for deleting similar outdated "lists of Wikipedians" here, here, here, and here. Delete all. Black Falcon (Talk) 00:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: I changed the indents to a bulleted list (which I think is much clearer and content-appropriate) and replaced the second Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Pakistan with Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Peru (which you presumably meant). I hope you don't mind. — The Storm Surfer 01:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Yes, "Peru" is what I intended. I also agree that a bulleted list is better when there are so many entries. Thanks for making the changes. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 07:15, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all This process has already earned the consent of everyone involved. Good work as usual by Black Falcon and the User Categories team. Shalom Hello 03:47, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all - redundant, and outmoded. --Haemo 04:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all - They're replaced by ones which are easier to put wikipedians on anyways. --Hirohisat Talk 01:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all - Precedent has already been established. Harryboyles 11:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.