Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject sdlBasic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete all. Xoloz 15:41, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject sdlBasic

Wikipedia:WikiProject sdlBasic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

I propose that this WikiProject and its affiliated pages be deleted for the following reasons:

  1. Inactivity. The project was started on January 28, 2006 and has not been substantially edited since January 29, 2006 (see history). The project's creator and sole member has been mostly inactive since February 2006, having made only 10 edits since then, most of them in the userspace (see [1]).
  2. Scope. The scope of the project is "to better organize information in articles related to sdlBasic. However, no article by that title exists, as it was deleted in January 2006 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SdlBasic. If we need not have an article on sdlBasic, we certainly do not need a WikiProject on articles related to sdlBasic Black Falcon (Talk) 23:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Wikipedia:WikiProject sdlBasic/Members (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Template:WikiProject sdlBasic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – only transcluded onto the project page
Template:WikiProject sdlBasic user (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – transcluded onto the project page and two pages in the userspace
Category:WikiProject sdlBasic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Note: I am including the two templates and the category in this nomination (rather than in separate nominations at TFD and CFD) as their existence is only justified by the existence of the project. If the latter is deleted, the former have no reason for being. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 23:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Once again, Black Falcon has proven his case. YechielMan 00:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - per nom. No need for a project which has no relevant content. John Carter 01:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. No article on a subject should certainly mean there shouldn't be a need for a Wikiproject on it. VegaDark 04:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Joe I 05:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.