Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject no anonymous editing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Clear delete Hiding talk 20:09, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject no anonymous editing

This is an inappropriate WikiProject. From Wikipedia:WikiProject: A WikiProject is a collection of pages devoted to the management of a specific family of information within Wikipedia. It is not a place to write encyclopedia articles, but a resource to help coordinate and organize article writing. Wikiprojects should not be forums for advocacy, nor petitions. They are for writing articles and managing the encyclopaedia content. Advocacy can easily be carried out in userspace, if it must be carried out. This is an abuse of the project namespace. [[Sam Korn]] 22:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Sam said it well. JesseW, the juggling janitor 01:14, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom, and anything that actively discourages productive editing deserves to go away.--Sean|Black 01:25, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. I note that anon editing is a Foundation issue and a WikiProject is the wrong way to deal with this is you really want to see it, and I think having this project is damaging to the community. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikiprojects are not advocacy organizations. --Carnildo 05:22, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. «LordViD» 10:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Policy issues like this should be discussed on the Village Pump. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 18:27, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep why haven't you put up Wikipedia:Wikiproject no ads too for deletion? --Revolución (talk) 00:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  • {{sofixit}} 68.39.174.238 16:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I shall, as soon as this debate is over. [[Sam Korn]] 18:13, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete innapropriate advocacy Wikiproject. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 04:13, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete What would sort of activism they do to encourage this? Spam Wikien-l? Ashibaka tock 05:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: why is this a Wikiproject? Why isn't it a proposed policy page? If it were, there would be no problem in a group of editors arguing to ban anon contributions (I would oppose it, as I suspect would most, but they could argue for it if they wanted). David | Talk 20:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Bad idea. Preaky 05:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as an inappropriate use of WikiProject space. -- nae'blis _(talk) 18:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.