Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Soft drinks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux ^Talk 05:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Soft drinks

This project has been inactive for a short while, and no further participation seems to have occurred. SunStar Net 14:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - Project has only been inactive for around a month. I generally prefer three months of inactivity before even declaring a project inactive, let alone proposing it for deletion. Badbilltucker 15:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It's relatively new and hasn't been effectively promoted yet. There is a definite need for it. Daniel Case 15:29, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per above. -- Szvest Ω ^{Wiki Me Up ®} 17:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per 2 above -- → p00rleno (lvl 77) ←ROCKS^C_RS 9:25pm Et nov 20 2006
• Comment - I have joined the project lately, and it now has both a project banner and a rather clearer scope. It is also listed on the new projects section of the Wikipedia:Community Portal. I have also initiated a discussion of the possible expansion of the project to include a variety of other articles which are right now not within the scope of any other projects, with the exception of the parent Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink. I request that the nomination be withdrawn so that the newly reformed project be given a chance to see if it can get enough members and activity to become a viable and constructive project. Badbilltucker 02:02, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep I think its still to soon for an MfD but if the project continues to become inactive then that's another story.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 09:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per interest expressed by Badbulltucker. JChap2007 01:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment another new member, also a newcomer to wikipedia, joined yesterday. Badbilltucker 01:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep- Just because it's been inactive for a month it shouldn't be deleted. Wait a few months, more inactivity, then request this for deletion. Kyo cat^meow! 00:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Daniel Case and inasmuch as, even were the project moribund, deletion as inactive would not necessarily be counseled; WikiProjects of which users no longer partake ought sometimes to be kpet in view of their comprising information that editors working on articles in the areas the WPs cover might find useful (we need not, of course, per Badbilltucker, to reach the latter question here; I mean only to suggest that inactive WikiProject is not a categorically controlling reason for deletion at MfD). Joe 20:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.