Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Reality TV
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Shalom Hello 20:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Reality TV
Dead project. No activity since January. RobJ1981 03:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, tag as {{inactive}}. We generally don't delete inactive WikiProjects; there's no reason to. Melsaran (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - page could function as a good "parent" project to many of those other reality TV projects out there, and could take over their functions if/when they become inactive. This isn't to say that the existing project page couldn't be improved on a lot, though. John Carter 14:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep As Melsaran said, we do not usualy delete inactive portals. I also agree with John Carter. It could functions as a parent project, and be a replacement when reality tv projects become inactive. Since there is a possibility that the project will do well, we should keep it for the meantime.--SJP 00:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - some bozo recently joined the project, so I guess it isn't inactive anymore. Templates and further development of the project page may well happen if the project isn't deleted. John Carter 16:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep reality TV has a huge scope on the project. Additionally, I wouldn't call someone joining a Wikiproject a "bozo". Even if it stays inactive (which I doubt it will since a user has already joined) I would still keep it for other Wikiprojects to build from...especially TV scope. DigitalNinja 20:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and tag as {{inactive}}. Again, no reason to simply delete this, it covers a lot of articles. Maybe someone will come along and get it started again. H2O 23:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.