Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Nyeusigrube
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep... Ultimately I think this'll end up going down the pan... But currently there is activity on the project. If they can find reliable sources for the lead article then that's great... But I think that's the limit of the project (the characters will never be notable enough to have articles). Thanks/wangi 20:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Nyeusigrube
Wikiproject with only two members that focuses on certain novels written by one young vampire author. The project's title article, Nyeusigrube, was recently deleted as lacking notability. I can't see any benefit to having a project on this. CĂșchullain t/c 07:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- if you are afraid that there aren't many members on it then you should put it in inactive wikiprojects NOT delete. --HRH Crown Princess Abi of the United lands of Liberty 16:58, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- if you look closely Nyeusigrube was deleted for lack of sources, NOT non-notability. --HRH Crown Princess Abi of the United lands of Liberty 16:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Qualified Keep - based on the fact that project was only recently created. The project has only existed for a month. While I question whether such a limited scope requires a separate project, as opposed to a task force of Wikipedia:WikiProject Fictional series, I think it might be a good idea to give the project a slightly longer time to get membership and prove itself. John Carter 18:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- you wonder that there should not be a wikiproject for a single series? why not demote WP artemis fowl or WP harry potter? they are also a small series of books and both of them have in actuality fewer books than WP Nyeusigrube HRH Crown Princess Abi of the United lands of Liberty 22:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Qualified Keep - based on the fact that project was only recently created. The project has only existed for a month. While I question whether such a limited scope requires a separate project, as opposed to a task force of Wikipedia:WikiProject Fictional series, I think it might be a good idea to give the project a slightly longer time to get membership and prove itself. John Carter 18:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- if you look closely Nyeusigrube was deleted for lack of sources, NOT non-notability. --HRH Crown Princess Abi of the United lands of Liberty 16:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Lack of reliable sources is pretty much the same as non-notability. Bi 06:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Deletion of the title article means that there's no use for the project. hmwith talk 15:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- keep project i realized i forgot to vote. HRH Crown Princess Abi of the United lands of Liberty 17:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, very limited scope, and the title article was deleted. --Coredesat 07:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.