Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Nintendo Wars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sr13 03:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Nintendo Wars
Scope: It's narrow scope of 10 articles makes a project like this useless.
Inactivity: Recently a few new participants have been joining, but that's all that the project has done since November. Greeves (talk • contribs • reviews) 16:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - As nom. Greeves (talk • contribs • reviews) 16:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Too narrow. bibliomaniac15 05:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Move. This might attract some attention from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Nintendo or WP:CVG, so it might be better left as a temporary taskforce for one or both of those projects. - Mgm|(talk) 09:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Maintainer's Vote Move per Mgm's vote reason. Although it might work on Wikipedia:WikiProject Strategy games because of Nectaris. --Juigi Kario (Charge! * My crusades) 23:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Move to a subpage of Wikipedia:WikiProject Nintendo, possibly Wikipedia:WikiProject Nintendo/Nintendo Wars or something along those lines. --Coredesat 14:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - If this would become a task force, it would be better as Wikipedia:WikiProject Nintendo/Nintendo Wars with the Nintendo project. Greeves (talk • contribs • reviews) 21:45, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Even a taskforce wouldn't serve much purpose for this. Very broad subject with only a few articles. RobJ1981 19:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
