Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Intentional Living

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was intentionally delete. IronGargoyle 01:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Intentional Living

This Wikiproject really only covers two articles, Intentional living and Intentional community. It also only has two participants and no activity since February despite having a spamlink for the Project on top of the Intentional Living article (and not within a self-ref block, either). Furthermore, the base article of this project still lacks references (aside from a dictionary...) and is a start-class article at best in writing quality. Relevant content can be moved to the IL talk page, which is where the collaboration probably should have gone in the first place.

As a side comment... I don't mean to get too much into the merit of the article itself, but I know a _lot_ of vegetarians and co-opers and so on, and I've never heard them self-describe as "intentional livers." Which according to apparently also includes open marriages ("infidelity") and penny-pinching ("frugality") and any kind of utopian commune, according to Category:Intentional living. This strikes me as the kind of really abstract general thing that declares "Hey! Look! Everything is actually a subclass of us;" perhaps the article and category should be deleted as well? (It's hard to tell, since without refs in the article, its notability is unclear, and Google turns up a lot of extraneous hits.) SnowFire 01:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Delete or merge with another project. Bearian 01:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete because it is not a broad enough scope for a wikiproject and because it is an inactive wikiproject.--James, La gloria è a dio 01:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.