Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Health controversies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Thanks/wangi 18:13, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Health controversies

Despite the great length of the page, all I see is two old collaborations and three members, with no directly project related acitivity since the last member joined in February. Main Health controversies article, Portal:Health controversies, and Category:Health controversies seem to have been deleted or to never have existed. Members are being informed of this discussion. John Carter 22:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, minimal activity for a full year. YechielMan 22:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: A truly excellent idea, but this particular incarnation appears to be defunct. Of the 3 listed participants, one is under ArbCom sanction for tendentious editing and fringe POV-pushing on medical topics, and another has long since left Wikipedia. Delete, and consider starting anew. MastCell ^Talk 18:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, or mark as {{historical}}. It appears that the project, since its inception more than a year ago, has received little attention and participation. (I count fewer than twenty-five edits to the project page in nearly sixteen months, and no edits of substance for at least four months.) The idea had potential, but it just doesn't have the drawing power to be a sustainable WikiProject right now. Redirecting to Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine might also be reasonable; this project would seem a natural subproject of that one, and the medicine project seems to be self-sustaining. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 01:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, or mark as {{historical}}. A good idea, but with very little participation and attention, why bother? --tennisman 15:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.