Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Baywatch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 16:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Baywatch

This project has been inactive since late November 2006, it's been given more than enough time. No one has shown any interest in this at all. On a side note: many inactive projects probably should be put in MFD. What purpose does long inactive projects serve? If there hasn't been interest for many months, there probably wont be any interest ever. RobJ1981 01:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete or maybe userfy if the creator still wants access to it. The whole point of Wikiproject is to facilitate coordinated group editing; if only one person is doing it, it's not a real Wikiproject. As to the point you raised, yes, inactive Wikiprojects should be listed here. User:Black Falcon and User:The Sunshine Man have already begun that process. You can ask them for tips if you wish to join the effort. YechielMan 04:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - existing project as no other parties have joined it since it's inception. Also agree that all WikiProject which have been inactive for a long enough time should be considered for deletion as well. John Carter 14:08, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per above.--James, La gloria è a dio 01:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Too detailed, and inactive. bibliomaniac15 An age old question... 03:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.