Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Vigilante

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by East718 in accordance with WP:CSD#R2. Acalamari 02:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Vigilante

Concept is clearly redundant with WP:CVU. In addition, it seems to indicate that vigilantism is a good idea for trying to maintain wikipedia. Burzmali (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete borderline attack page. In fact, I'm gonna nominate it under G10 right now. <eleland/talkedits> 20:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh wait, xgmx created it himself. Weird. Well, it can kick around for a few days without harm, I guess. <eleland/talkedits> 20:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete serves no purpose--Phoenix-wiki ^{(talk · contribs)} 21:52, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete nonsense, creator is a vandal himself This is a Secret ^account 03:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • No, just a very new user who isn't clear on how things are done around here. (See his contributions page for evidence - I checked it a minute ago.) Walton^One 18:43, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
    • A user that have edited since 11 November 2006, is hardly new. Not to mention the half dozen or so articles he has created that have been sent to CSD or AfD. Burzmali (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Or edits like this This is a Secret ^account 21:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
• Preserve I made it so that users who see vandalism won't just sit there and let the spam be, they will do something, not wait for some admin or moderator, who might not find it until thousands of people have read that and believe that false information, it is merely there to convince the users to save Wikipedia from itself. --Xgmx (talk) 15:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
  • FYI, we don't actually have "moderators" on Wikipedia, since we're not primarily a discussion site. Walton^One 18:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Userfy. If he is proud of fighting vandalism, then let this page stand. It doesn't do any harm, and considering that editors, not webspace, are our most important resource, deleting it is likely to serve little purpose other than potentially driving its creator away. It doesn't belong in projectspace, since it doesn't serve any useful purpose, but if moved to his userspace, I see no reason not to allow it to continue. Walton^One 18:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
• Agreed. Ok I'll move it there --Xgmx (talk) 06:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.