The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep the page has now been noted as historical. Hidingtalk 13:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Potentially useful, but very old and presumably out of date. It's unloved and abandoned. kingboyk 22:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Keep but tag as {{historical}} until/unless it moves back into active use. As you say, someone might someday be able to make this useful. In the meantime, it consumes few resources. Rossami(talk) 23:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.