Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Schools4

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete per creator request. No arguments for keeping. --Coredesat 04:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Schools4

Created as WP:POINT creation to contrast with WP:SCHOOLS3 so the creator could cite it here JoshuaZ 04:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete, textbook WP:POINT. --Coredesat 04:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's things like this that make me think WP:NOTPOLICY should be at least a guideline. You can't create a proposal and then use it as policy in an argument. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 05:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Unfortunately, WP:SCHOOLS3, an almost equally slanted "guideline" is already being used as justification for AfDs. Alansohn 21:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as nonsense. This is not an attempt to write an "all schools are notable" guideline but rather a cut-and-paste job to make a point. Eluchil404 06:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Attempt by author to confuse the issue. Jcam 15:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as bad-faith WP:POINT creation. Shimeru 20:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete (creator of article) proposed guideline has served is its purpose and can be safely deleted. Alansohn 21:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.