Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for tail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 22:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for tail

Nothing whatsoever good can come from this page. We don't need a project space page promoting sexual harassment. --B 04:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. It's a joke. Laugh. Zetawoof_(ζ) 04:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Humorous yes...really a good idea...no. Jmlk17 06:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Neither funny, clever, nor beneficial to the encyclopedia. There are legitimate uses of humour in community-building on Wikipedia, but this is not one of them. Walton^One 10:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. We can't set a precedent for half-funny "jokes". Otherwise we get Wikipedia:Wikipedia isn't fucking censored, asshole or Wikipedia:Assume good witch or bad witch?.--WaltCip 12:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

  Like Don't be a dick? — xaosflux ^Talk 00:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep --MichaelLinnear 00:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Why? (A rationale is usually expected on a contentious MfD - this is a !vote, not a vote.) Walton^One 12:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not funny and not useful. Hut 8.5 13:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Jmlk17 said it best. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 22:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete An non-humorous joke that contributes nothing to Wikipedia.  hmwith  talk 23:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, but not because of sexual harassment concerns or anything like that. Delete it because it's not funny. We should be able to delete the really lame jokes, but still have a sense of humor. -- Ned Scott 01:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It's not funny. Sometimes humor is ok, but this isn't funny, or appropriate. I  ^{(said) (did)} 04:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I understand there are several humor pages on wikipedia, but this one's a bit too far. WP:CRAZYTEST and things like that are more wikipedia related, but not this one.Hirohisat ^Talk 06:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete <joke>or move to Wikipedia:Requests for trim</joke> It is funny. --Jack Merridew 13:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• 

  

  Fluffy tails make work much easier! They make communication easier! And if a vandal brutally takes away your tail (as almost happens in this illustration) it should only be a matter of filing a request at Requests for fluffy tails!
  I guess this is a bit weak comment, but I guess it'd be better to Move this to Wikipedia:Requests for fluffy tails and refactor the article's purpose! No reason why the junk can't exist in the history. Sexual harassment concerns are serious; however, if we change the page's purpose entirely, this might actually work! As I noted in the talk page, I can't see anything wrong with giving other people access to fluffy tails. They're soft and bushy! They make life much easier and cuter and aww. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 14:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

• Sorry. I don't have a reaction to "cute" as most editors do. I maintain my delete position. It's not funny, much less suitable for Wikipedia space.--WaltCip 14:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • For the record, my !vote should be read as "extremely weak keep, basically harmless". =) I don't think we lost much if this gets deleted, but I can't see what's the giant hurry to delete this, either. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Not even remotely funny. Not useful either. --SXT4 14:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete page is offensive and not funny. -N 19:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.