Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Laleena
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete as user test. >Radiant< 15:01, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Laleena
This user, who has 5 contributions, has not edited this request for adminship or any other page, since 7 October. Since the user in question has no chance at adminship at this point and has not even edited in almost a week, I strongly believe that the request should simply be deleted. Srose (talk) 16:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - housekeeping (there's not a lot of info on there anyway, so it can easily be recreated if and when). Yomanganitalk 16:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - high marks for enthusiasm; low marks for total of 5 edits to date (counting nomination). Of course, if there actually are votes of any kind in sufficient number, I guess then it should probably be kept. Badbilltucker 16:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and close. Per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Andy5190, the proper response to an un-transcluded and abandoned RFA should be to keep and close it immediately. --Metropolitan90 03:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- That RfA had comments so would have historical interest - this one has never been edited apart from by the user, so the same argument to keep doesn't apply (IMHO). Yomanganitalk 09:11, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.