Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bjaco18

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted at user request (non-admin closure) Collectonian (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bjaco18

User has completely missed the point of RfA and has no hope of passing due to the lack of policy experience. Formatted wrongly, never transcluded, basically being used as an extension of the userpage. Sorry, I just didn't know what to do with the page, and didn't want to delete it outright as I have just removed a lot of the user's work from various articles in the last few minutes. J Milburn (talk) 19:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, speedy if possible. Seems to just be messing around. Collectonian (talk) 19:36, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, as above. Nk.sheridan   Talk 19:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Not at all worth archiving.--WaltCip (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - User seems to be fooling around, completely the wrong use of RfA. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 20:45, May 13, 2008 (UTC)
• Delete user is apparently goofing around with RfA and not using for its intended purpose. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete blatant misuse of the Wikipedia space. EJF (talk) 18:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Has there been any attempt to get in touch with the user? I don't see any comments on the page being discussed, or on his talk page, & he does not have email activated. Given his declared age, it would seem that an effort should have been made in that direction first. I've at least posted now, but it should have been tried before placing the AfD. DGG (talk) 18:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Maybe it should, but this was the last thing I dealt with after going through the user's contributions and cleaning up almost all articles he had created/contributed to, and deleting the majority of images. Call me lazy, but I just thought it better to nominate, and if the user cared to ask why I had, explain then. J Milburn (talk) 18:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
• Comment — user has placed a {{db-self}} tag on his user talk page underneath the notification. ... discospinster _talk 21:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I suggested to him that he place such a tag, but he got confused on what page. I assume he means to delete this one, and I have speedy deleted per user request. As he is still discussing his article contributions, I assume he did not mean to delete his user talk page. DGG (talk) 01:56, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.