The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete as housekeeping. Hut 8.5 20:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Untranscluded RFA, malformed, shouldn't count against candidate actual submitting an RFA. MBisanztalk 20:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Quick question, MBisanz, are we going to be muddling through an MfD on all of these (there are several "untranscluded malformed" RfAs), or can they be speedied after contacting the authors? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
And, perhaps answering my question, it was just deleted...hmmm.. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:10, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.