Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Primetime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Should have been closed a while ago (a month, to be exact), but no arguments to delete in the month it's been open. --Coredesat 23:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Primetime

We don't need these elaborate pages giving a hall of fame to blatant vandals - if someone is blatantly compromising the integrity of the encyclopedia, we block them. Similar pages (Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Willy on Wheels/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Mr. Pelican Shit) also got deleted, so I don't see why this should stay. Note: I'm going through the Wikipedia vandalism category and listing all these related pages for mfd. --AAA! ^{(AAAA • AAAAAAAA)} 10:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. This user is active across many projects and has a subtle method. This is one of the cases in which a special listing is most needed. -Will Beback · † · 11:19, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Will Beback mentioned this guy was causing trouble just a couple weeks ago. Anomo 12:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment by banned user removed. MER-C 12:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Primetime what's the deal with adding all the copyright stuff? It sounds like when when a certain person (I'd say their name but I don't want on their hivemind page) made a copyright scanner and said it was to cause trouble to wikipedia to find that copyright violations are all over the place? Is that what you're trying to do? Anomo 12:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

• Comment by banned user removed. MER-C 12:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

• What is with all the copyright violations? Anomo 12:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Please don't feed trolls. --Connel MacKenzie - wikt 19:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep User being discussed on Commons at present with reference to this page. As there is still active discussion, the page is still relevant and should be kept. -- Infrogmation 14:53, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep This abuser puts Wikipedia in mortal danger. If enough of his copyright violations get through, Britannica will have enough evidence to sue this site out of existence and do away with its biggest competitor. Jesse Viviano 18:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep As much as I like the concept of WP:DENY, the inter-project coordination points most often to WP:'T (which redirects to this.) Unless you verify that the hundreds of sister projects no longer link here, you should not even consider removing this page. Recent activity on en.wiktionary.org shows that this is still needed. Wikibooks and Wikisource have also had recent need of this information. --Connel MacKenzie - wikt 19:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Is this still up for deletion? I don't see it on WP:MFD and yet it hasn't been closed. 68.39.174.238 22:48, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep This is an exemption from WP:DENY, and this person is far more dangerous than a vandal, in fact this page is needed to keep track of the vandal. It isn't a "hall of fame" for a vandal, but similar to a WP:ABUSE report. --SunStar Net^talk 01:09, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. A mock-puppet of this User (67.165.216.16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) is active. See WP:AN#User:67.165.216.16. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep per the fact that info on this guy should be handed out to every editor, as he could, if left to pretend he doesn't exist, kill Wikimedia. -- Chris is me _{(u/c/t) 05:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)}
• Keep or move to Meta and get it sprotected there. Pelican shit vandalism is a no-brainer, as is Willy, but this kind of crap needs lots of data to help manage future socks, like the one today. This fuckwit is still here. Fix WP:DENY issues by careful use of scorn and mockery, I'd say. Guy (Help!) 23:38, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep- its definitely needed, we vandal fighters need to be able to reference this if needed. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 04:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Good grief, I hadn't realized how active this guy still was. And given his purpose and utterly misguided view of himself as a Robin Hood of copyrighted material, an actual danger to the project himself. --Calton | Talk 00:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Close It's been a month already and no one has come up with a credible argument to delete. Since I can't find this anywhere on the main WP:MfD page I will list under today with a recomendadion to immediately close as Keep. Eluchil404 22:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.