Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:HK wikipedians' notice board

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 22:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:HK wikipedians' notice board

The noticeboard has been officially superceded by WikiProject Hong Kong. This MfD includes all Notice Board subpages as well. Luke! 04:01, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletions. -- :Raphaelmak: [talk] [contribs] 04:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - In fact until this day I have never known about this notice page. Well anyway I hope that the notice board be kept for historical interest. --:Raphaelmak: [talk] [contribs] 04:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. A Wikiproject about Hong Kong is not necessarily the same thing as a noticeboard for people who are from Hong Kong. -Amarkov moo! 04:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I always forget this list exist cause it blend in so well with all the other buttons. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Benjwong (talk • contribs) 05:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
• Delete That noticeboard has long become inactive, and I've just now brought the editing requests at Wikipedia:HK wikipedians' notice board and Wikipedia:HK wikipedians' notice board/Complete to do list over on to Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong/Requests. There's no need for the noticeboard anymore because the Hong Kong WikiProject is active and much more coordinated. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 06:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. There are lot of discussions on Hong Kong topics, tracible consensus in the past. — HenryLi (Talk) 00:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, already tagged as historical, and RNBs have slightly different scopes than WikiProjects, so it cannot be "officially superceded". Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 23:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.