Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:GFDL History (unofficial)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. >Radiant< 12:08, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:GFDL History (unofficial)

From the page:

In accordance with the GFDL, this page lists GFDL sources, with publication date, authors, publisher (if applicable), and a network location for "public access to a Transparent copy of the Document".

Thing is, the list has only three entries, one of which is Wikipedia itself and another of which is Nupedia, the somewhat less successful experts-only free encyclopedia project that preceded Wikipedia. I am pretty certain we have more GFDL sources than that. The page was edited once in 2002, once in 2003, once in 2004, once in 2005 and again today when I tagged it; I think it's fair to say that the page isn't being utilized. Since, unlike most pages tagged as {{historical}}, nobody actually seems to have paid much attention to the page in the first place, I'm suggesting we might as well delete it rather than just tagging as historical, since the information it contains is unlikely to be of any use even from that perspective – Gurch 21:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.