Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Eleventy-billion pool/old

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep. - Mailer Diablo 17:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Billion pool, Wikipedia:Eleventy-billion pool and Wikipedia:Trillion pool

These events are way too far in the future for there to be pools for them. They should be deleted. MOOOO 13:11, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy close debate. Nomination by User:Science3456 sock. Wikipedia:Billion pool and Wikipedia:Trillion pool are already cover at the nomination above. Wikipedia:Eleventy-billion pool actually is funny. —Ruud 16:14, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Two of these three are already under consideration at DRV, rendering this MfD partially moot. As to eleventy billion, if it's funny, BJAODN it. The endless reproduction of these pools must cease, and so all absurdly large number pools need to fall out of wikispace on principle. Xoloz 19:17, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy close debate. per Ruud. These aren't Bad jokes, so BJAODN should not be brought up. Timrem 19:19, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
    • LOL. As always, the bad part is in the eye of the beholder! :) Xoloz 19:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep the Wikipedia:Eleventy-billion pool for amusement purposes only. Delete the others. Andrew 20:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Hang on a mo. If WP is growing at about 12.5% per month 1 billion is less than 4 years away. Rich Farmbrough 17:15 17 May 2006 (UTC).
  • Delete all as silly useless pools. Stifle (talk) 18:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
  • stong Speedy Keep This page contane humer and sherd not be deleted.
  • Keep I think it's nice! :/. Homestarmy 19:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

look here Wikipedia:Billion pool

Miscellany for deletion This miscellaneous page was nominated for deletion on 2006-04-04. The result of the discussion was Keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.
**My Cat inn @ (talk)** 20:23, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. That message was placed on the talk page by yet another User:Science3456 sock. —Ruud 20:14, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.