Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Editor review/AirFrance358

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was snowball delete. Acalamari 18:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Editor review/AirFrance358

I found this page while looking through the contributions of Reverberationecho, who created a number of pages today that were speedied. Essentially, the page is Reverberationecho's attempt at using Wikipedia as a soapbox to make a point about a user who was blocked on the Chinese-language Wikipedia. The editor review is not linked from the main project page, so it's not necessarily getting in the way of anything, but neither does this stuff belong on the English Wikipedia. Since the Wikipedia namespace restricts me to the general criteria, I couldn't find an appropriate criteria for speedy deletion, so I'm bringing it here instead. jonny-mt^(t)_(c)I'm on editor review! 13:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Mish-mash.--WaltCip 17:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, has no place in the English Wikipedia project. Punkmorten (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Inappropriate for Wikipedia. Not a real editor review. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 14:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete → not a proper editor review. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete inappropriate here. 哦， 是吗？(review O) 06:15, 06 December 2007 (GMT)
• Delete not appropriate, not a proper editor review. --Son (talk) 15:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.