Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion of vanity articles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Kept - You can't change policy by trying to delete it. --Cyde↔Weys 04:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Deletion of vanity articles

I don't know why we need a policy to immediatly delete articles if we have a {{tl:notablity}} tag. It probably should be called "Deletion of short articles lacking details" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.163.100.7 (talk • contribs) .

• Speedy keep viable official policy. DVD+ R/W 03:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. we have WP:AFD and it usually causes the author to recreate the page and a dispute ensues. User:Can't sleep, Yankees will beat Red Sox (and I have nothing to do with the clown user) 03:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, per WP:POINT: "If you wish to change an existing procedure or guideline... don't push the existing rule to its limits in an attempt to prove it wrong, or nominate the existing rule for deletion" Titoxd^(?!?) 03:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

  Sorry for the late comment, but Cyde closed the discussion as I was replying to the previos vote. Any suggestions on how to propose a change? before you block me 04:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

  Try the talk page first, and if that doesn't work, WP:RFC. Titoxd^(?!?) 04:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.