Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Limmy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by Mushroom in accordance with WP:CSD#G6.[1] Acalamari 02:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Limmy

Apparently someone tried making a submission to Articles for creation, but rather botched it up a bit. After further investigation, this would have been declined anyway due to conflict of interest, a lack of neutrality, and probably non-notability as well, so I'd propose we just delete it to get the page out of the way. It serves absolutely no purpose otherwise, no pages link to it. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Seems to be an article in the wrong namespace. Even if moved would still have conflict of interest, a lack of neutrality, and probably non-notability problems. Thedjatclubrock :) ^(T/C) 00:17, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, probably a newbie mistake (he should have submitted it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Today in a new section). I'll post it there, review it, and then we can delete this page as G6 housekeeping. Melsaran (talk) 20:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
  • I see that it has already been posted in article namespace at Limmy, by the same editor, so there's no point in reviewing it. Tagged for G6. Melsaran (talk) 20:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.