Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Usernames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted per author request. I didn't put in a redirect because as this board has never been used and is not even close to a misspelling, it seems illogical. If nothing else, people who followed the hypothetical redirect might think that RFC had something to do with admins, which it doesn't. But if anyone disagrees enough to want to create a redirect, feel free. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 23:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Usernames

Created after a user was apparently inappropriately blocked on the grounds of username impersonation. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names is the place to discuss usernames that may be inappropriate, and username blocks that need to be overturned are rare enough that we don't need a separate forum to discuss them, they can just be reported on the main admin noticeboards. Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 10:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

I had no idea that the RFC page for User names existed when I created this page. I have no objections to deleting it. User:Zoe|^(talk) 17:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Wouldn't redirecting it be simpler? Shimgray | talk | 18:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirects are cheap. Zoe doesn't mind it being deleted. So, speedy redirect or speedy delete, either way we don't need a debate about it :) --kingboyk 22:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.