Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Rjd0060/Archive index
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Delete {{db-author}} — xaosflux Talk 00:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User talk:Rjd0060/Archive index
I was going to start autoarchiving my user talk page but decided against it. Rjd0060 22:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment You do realize you can tag it with {{db-author}} and it'll be deleted, right? -Jéské (v^_^v Kacheek!) 22:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- I tried that (in fact, it still says that) but it is not showing up on CAT:CSD because it wants some deletion rationale (since it is a talk page) so I did this instead. - Rjd0060 23:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- That's messed up. Insta-nuke per author's request. If one wants a talk subpage that nobody would use gone, the request should be honored. -Jéské (v^_^v Kacheek!) 23:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- I know. It would be a lot easier to just leave it as CSD but it isn't working. - Rjd0060 23:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- That's messed up. Insta-nuke per author's request. If one wants a talk subpage that nobody would use gone, the request should be honored. -Jéské (v^_^v Kacheek!) 23:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- I tried that (in fact, it still says that) but it is not showing up on CAT:CSD because it wants some deletion rationale (since it is a talk page) so I did this instead. - Rjd0060 23:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.