Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Jenndcook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted following blanking by owner, who seems not to have realized they were on a public wiki. Show's over. -- nae'blis 23:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Jenndcook

Talk page being used as a message board. Has made no other contributions other than at User_talk:Sasser123 which seems to be used as another message board. It should probably be noted also that personal information has been posted such as phone numbers: [1]. -WarthogDemon 00:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - I take a relatively lenient approach in userspace deletion nominations but this is ridiculous. Newyorkbrad 01:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Addendum: Speedy Delete per subsequent developments noted below. Newyorkbrad 23:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment any way to post the entire thing on WP:BJAODN? Unless one thinks it inappropriate. I'm only suggesting it because never would I imagine something like this actually happening and I'm finding it slightly hilarious ... much to my shame. -WarthogDemon 01:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. MER-C 02:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - Mailer Diablo 11:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment the user had just blanked the page. Given the circumstances and the pages contents, we can probably assume she wants us to delete this... -WarthogDemon 18:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Further Comment I put <!--these tags--> over the context of the page. Given the fact the user is probably embarrassed, I decided to spare her further embarrassment by hiding the context so only people who review the page here will see it. -WarthogDemon 05:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT. What's wrong with email? I suppose they didn't realise everyone could read it and though of WP as a free (private?) messaging service. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 13:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment apparently a friend of one of them told them that no one could see it but them. -WarthogDemon 19:40, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.