Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Jborg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was WP:SNOW delete as violation of all policy. I will be reviewing the edits of the user, blocking, and salting.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 03:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Jborg

It's way past my bedtime, but it was worth staying up for this. Just when you think you've seen everything...let's just say Wikipedia is not a free web host. Maybe one of our detectives can figure out if the Savannah user has her own talk page, and delete that too. YechielMan 06:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete pure rubbish. Blatant violation of WP:NOT#SOCIALNET. Also consider warning the user... --KZ ^{Talk • Contrib} 10:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Bjaodn for we must preserve a record of this informative exchange between J and S lest they forget the intervention by "this Walter guy". –Pomte 11:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy - as "this Walter guy" might object to the references to him in the third person. I would love to (probably without authorization) turn this into a joke page, though. John Carter 15:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as nonsense. James, La gloria è a dio 16:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. The editor has signed up purely to comment on his talk page. CloudNine 20:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete No actual edits here except for on his/her talk page, being used as a Myspace.Tellyaddict 09:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.