Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Chap0230
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 18:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User talk:Chap0230
As per WP:NOT#CHAT. E Wing (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I have repeatedly warned this whole network of users to refrain from using user talk pages inappropriately. They consistently ignore my warnings. I suggest some sort of block is appropriate. WilliamH (talk) 17:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WilliamH. Page blanking without admin-deleting may be sufficient. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 05:17, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Delete inappropriate use on sight, they'll learn, but be nice. Is there any chance that they will make useful contributions? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, they never have done since the numerous warnings I've given them. WilliamH (talk) 17:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Here's your list. User_talk:Mservais, User_talk:LoveYaXO, User_talk:Lovah11, User_talk:Jonnella99, User_talk:Jef225, User_talk:Fossilfinder444,User_talk:Fossilfinder44, User_talk:Dongusdoodle, User_talk:Ccherkin, User_talk:Carolemott, User_talk:Bnut7, User_talk:Axc936, User_talk:Andrea1186, User_talk:Amandalcherkin, User_talk:Amandacherkin. I'm prepared to help. I think it is better to manage them as identified than risk just having them move to other accounts that we aren't watching. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- I see only accounts without contributions and a few welcomes. Have the offending contributions been deleted? Suppression of the records is counterproductive, unless you believe that only administrators should engage in behaviour monitoring. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, they have been deleted. I agree with your sentiment that managing them as opposed to going elsewhere - that is something that occurred to me too. Judging from recent messages, I'd hazard a guess that their intent on communicating this way might subside soon anyway. Also I don't believe talking to users about their behaviour should be reserved for administrators, partly because I'm not one. I only forwarded them on to a sysop because other than watching my notices getting removed, I didn't feel like there was much else I could do. WilliamH (talk) 02:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- I see only accounts without contributions and a few welcomes. Have the offending contributions been deleted? Suppression of the records is counterproductive, unless you believe that only administrators should engage in behaviour monitoring. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Here's your list. User_talk:Mservais, User_talk:LoveYaXO, User_talk:Lovah11, User_talk:Jonnella99, User_talk:Jef225, User_talk:Fossilfinder444,User_talk:Fossilfinder44, User_talk:Dongusdoodle, User_talk:Ccherkin, User_talk:Carolemott, User_talk:Bnut7, User_talk:Axc936, User_talk:Andrea1186, User_talk:Amandalcherkin, User_talk:Amandacherkin. I'm prepared to help. I think it is better to manage them as identified than risk just having them move to other accounts that we aren't watching. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Page-blank, and if that fails to work delete. Repeated violations of WP:NOT#CHAT even after warnings. User[s] do not seem to be interested in contributing to WP. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 11:23, May 10, 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. If page-blank approach does not succeed.Renee (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
