Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Bpejman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 18:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Bpejman

Vanity mainspace-style article in user talk space. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Studerby (talk • contribs) 22:40, September 28, 2007

• Delete It looks like a copy of the article Bob Pejman. nat^tang 08:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, not an active editor. If he were active, I'd feel differently. --UsaSatsui 18:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - editor has been inactive since December. Additionally, of his 36 edits in his history, 3 have been to Romantic realism, in which he added his own name and/or links to his work, 11 have been to Ahmad Pejman, a page on his father, 8 have been to an article on himself, and all the rest to his userpage. The concept "COI" springs to mind somehow. John Carter 15:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No need for a copy of his article on his userpage. However, a simple link to his article would be a good idea.  hmwith  talk 16:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.