Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Winterpersia/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz (talk) 16:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Winterpersia/sandbox

It's a sub-page recreation of a deleted article (deleted through afd). Page was created in user subpage to allow improvements but no edits have been made. Also, there's no attribution in the history to any other contributors (GDFL problem) however that may be because Winterpersia was the only contributor (I'm not an admin so I can't see the deleted history :) ).

I haven't left a note on the talk page because the user hasn't edited since October 30th. Seraphim ^Whipp 18:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

delete as per nom Jimfbleak (talk) 18:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

delete as this is an archive of an article in userspace, not a sandbox. - Koweja (talk) 06:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

delete it is, or was, a sandbox not an archive because Jim put it there for the user I gather; but it has been there too long without any effort to fix it. The GFDL issue Seraphim brings up is interesting (and problematic - even when the origin still exists, and copies of pages for revision are fairly common, they would normally never have an edit history with them).--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 04:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Delete, recreation of a deleted article that doesn't seem likely to have any more work done on it, with the user having left in October. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 18:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.