Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Willy turner/Userboxes/Islamic misogeny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete, we are only wikipedians on Wikipedia. Anything that might be considered offensive by a member of a religious group has no place on Wikipedia. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{C} 09:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Willy turner/Userboxes/Islamic misogeny

Inflammatory and divisive. Suggests misogyny to be Islamic and Islam to be misogynist. Does nothing to advance the project. Proabivouac 01:40, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep This is not inflammatory and I it is not violating any policies.--James, La gloria è a dio 02:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep since it doesn't really suggest Islam and misogyny to be equal. If someone is really against Islamic misogyny, someone is against Islamic misogyny. —  $PЯINGrαgђ  02:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Not inflamatory. It does not suggest that misogeny is islamic.--sefringle^Talk 03:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. -- sefringle^Talk 04:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Inflammatory. - Merzbow 05:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, I don't think MfD is the way to deal with this if you think it's inflammatory, but, having lived through the infobox wars I tend to think we should be happy this stuff is on user pages and leave them alone. gren グレン 07:16, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete inflamatory = yes, hence delete else someone could make many user-boxes on the following lines User:ALM_scientist/User_boxes/Western_women. Just like they find many things wrong in Islam I feel many thing wrong in western society. Lets respact each other. --- A. L. M. 08:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment both this one and ALM's are entertaining. Arrow740 09:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

  that is why both should be deleted. --- A. L. M. 09:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - same thing as the christian one below; it isn't divisive, and it doesn't suggest anything divisive—arf! 09:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.