Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ultima964
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted as content not allowed at all on Wikipedia.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:Ultima964
Spam, possibly a scam. User has made no non-spam edits to the site, just advertising. ffm ✎t 18:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't matter if he is honest, it isn't appropriate for wikipedia. Koweja 22:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - fairly obvious user page abuse. MER-C 05:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- comment Is there any sort of warning that can be given for attempted scamming on wikipedia? Frankly I'm not sure a mere delete goes far enough here. Wintermut3 23:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It is against policy in that it has to much on it not relating to wikipedia. Actualy nothing on it relates to wikipedia. Peace:) --James, La gloria è a dio 02:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Blatant violation of WP:USERPAGE and persistent spam by the user, just using wikipedia as an advertising service.Tellyaddict 19:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.