Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Travb/m

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted by NawlinWiki (talk · contribs) as a U1.[1] Daniel.Bryant 22:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Travb/m

Stalking, Unsubtantiated, Personal vendetta, NPA Violation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mobile 01 (talk • contribs)

  • Comment. This looks like preparation for an RfC or RfARB. Is this the case? If so, it should absolutely not be deleted. I also wonder about a conflict of interest on the part of the nominator, considering evidence against him listed on the page. Srose (talk) 18:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: I notified Travb, given it was his subpage. Hopefully he can clear up whether this is any of the above listed by Srose, or if not, exactly what it is. In the meantime, [2] may be of relevance, and worth reading. I hold no stance on the user subpage currently, and will wait for Travb's clarification before making one. Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 20:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete I saved the page off wiki, and don't need it anymore. Instead, I will list Mobile 01 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log · rfcu)'s behavior:
  1. User:Travb/m#Third_party_involvment and
  2. User:Travb/m#Third_party_opinions on the Firestone talk page, so future editors know what wikipolicies Mobile 01 has flagrantly violated, and so they will be on notice about her tactics. The rest of the relevant evidence on User:Travb/m is found here: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mobile 01 where it is shown conclusively that User:Mobile 01 is User:203.49.235.50 and User:203.49.235.50 signed her name User:NeilinOz1, which is Mobile 01's sockpuppet. Unfortunatly, the wikipedia community has let out a collective yawn about these violations. Travb (talk) 21:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.